Showing posts with label KJB. Show all posts
Showing posts with label KJB. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 4, 2020

Is Acts 1:8 A Command or Forthtelling?


Basing their actions on Matthew 28:19–20, many Christians and churches today are busy making disciples. While that may be implied from the passage, it doesn't say "make disciples" in the King James Bible. Jesus told the disciples to go, teach, baptize, and teach again.

Matthew 28:19–20


The idea conveyed here is to first be busy about the Father's business (go). Then tell people about God our Creator, our fallen condition, and about Jesus Christ—the Gospel (teach).

When someone has responded to the Gospel in saving faith, they're to be baptized (baptize). After a person is baptized, that brother or sister is to be built up in the faith (teaching them).

A person who has met the Savior will be ready to tell others about Christ. They'll witness to others about their personal encounter with the Lord Jesus Christ.

Andrew is an example of this in John 1:40–42. Though his faith was not yet mature, he instinctively wanted to bring his brother, Peter, to see Jesus Christ.

Acts 1:8


Shortly before His ascension, Jesus told the disciples:


... ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth (Acts 1:8).

Eager Christians often see this as a second command to go and make disciples. But is that really what the Lord was saying here?

What did Jesus Say in Acts 1:8?


In Matthew, Jesus said, go. It was an imperative statement; an order that His disciples proceed forth and teach others the Gospel.

In Acts however, there's no imperative. There's only a declarative statement: "ye shall be witnesses." When examining the language of "shall be," the Greek word, esomai, we can see that it can mean, shall come to pass, but it is not an imperative statement.

The word witness comes from the Greek word, martus, a legal term that infers testifying in court (e.g. giving his testimony) or non-legal term for retelling a personal encounter (e.g. sharing his experience).

John bore witness about what he'd heard, seen, and touched during his experience with Jesus Christ (1 John 1:1–3). He declared Christ with the readers of 1 John.

Peter wrote similar words when he expressed his eye-witness account of what he'd seen and heard during his time with Jesus Christ (2 Peter 1:6).

Paul witnessed of his encounter with Jesus on the road to Damascus (Acts 22:6–9 and 26:12–15).


Command or Forthtelling?


The words Jesus spoke in Acts 1:8 have often been interpreted as a command to witness to the uttermost part of the earth, but that is not what we see here.

It appears that the Lord was forthtelling and foretelling—telling the disciples what would come to pass: they shall be witnesses (i.e. the word of God for the present: forthtelling), and as witnesses, they would flow from where they were then, to the uttermost part of the earth (i.e. the future: foretelling).


Do we have it backwards?


As Christians, we may have it all wrong. Could it be that we place more importance on Matthew 28:19–20 than Acts 1:8? From what we read in Scripture, it appears Acts 1:8 is the foundation for Matthew 28:19–20.

Perhaps one reason some people dislike Christians, or perhaps many unbelievers reject God and His Son Jesus Christ is that for so long, Christians have been overbearing and failing to demonstrate Christlike attitudes and behaviors—failing to live the Christian life which we speak of.

Could it be that we haven't nurtured our own relationships with the Lord and haven't shown simple sincerity in our witness to others? Don't people look for sincerity from an evangelist?

But if you look at how the Lord conducted Himself, he wasn't overbearing and He absolutely exhibited righteousness. He walked and talked the Gospel. He shared His relationship with the Father, and now He asks believers to share our relationship with Him, with others—ye shall be my witnesses.


Be ready to answer.


Peter wrote to persecuted Christians that they were to be ready:
But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear (1 Peter 3:15).

Why were they to be ready to answer? Because as they lived their Christian lives before those who may have despised them, they'd draw some to them who would ask about their steadfast faith and continued good behavior (cf. 1 Peter 3:8–14).

These verses in 1 Peter 3 are not a mandate to debate unbelievers, but a command to be ready to answer questions about our real and living faith (cf. James 2:18).

In Revelation 2:4, the Lord rebuked the Church of Ephesus because they had lost their first love.

In John 17:3, the Lord, praying to the Father, spoke of knowing the Father and the Son as eternal life.


The Lord is interested in relationships.


Clearly, the Lord is interested in relationships with His people. He is referred to as our heavenly Father (e.g. Luke 11:2) and in an intimate way as Abba Father (e.g. Galatians 4:6). Believers are called sons (e.g. Romans 8:14) and that God deals with us as sons (Hebrews 12:7). He said to His people Israel that He walks among them and would be their God, and they His people (Leviticus 26:12, Deuteronomy 23:14).

Christians today are so caught up in making disciples that they neglect their relationships with the Lord (Revelation 2:4). Focus on ministry and soul-winning take the priority over fellowship, prayer, and personal times spent with the Lord.


God's word teaches us that . . .


We're to let our light shine that others may see it and glorify God (Matthew 5:16). What light do unbelievers see in us? It starts at home, then neighbors, then work, then branches out to the world (i.e. Jerusalem, Judaea, Samaria, and the uttermost parts of the earth).

We're to live peaceful lives (1 Thessalonians 4:11–12, Romans 12:18, Hebrews 12:14). How peaceful are our lives? Are we the rowdy ones on the block? Does our church make the most noise on Sundays? Are the soul-winners aggressive?

We're not to let evil be spoken of about us—nothing evil to say of us (Titus 2:8, 1 Peter 3:9,16; 2 Corinthians 8:21, 1 Thessalonians 5:15). How well do we fall into this description? What is our testimony to the world? 

We're to love God first (Matthew 22:37, Luke 10:27). Do unbelievers see the love we have for God? Not a touchy-feely love, but a love that seeks to follow God.

Do people see these things in our lives, do they see only Bible-thumpers, hear harsh words, and get gospel tracts shoved in their faces?

Do they hear the believer's testimony of what Jesus Christ has done for him or only mechanical Bible quotes?

Do people see genuine Christianity and want to know more about it? Before the Lord renewed me in the faith, I wanted to be a Christian because I could see there was something pure and good in them. Do others say that about us?


Soul-winning in Church?


These days, preachers and churches feel obligation to preach the Gospel in church services. But is that what we're supposed to be doing in church?

According to Ephesians 4 (4:11–15) and 1 Corinthians 14 (14:3–5,12,26) that's not what we're supposed to be doing. Believers are to be taught doctrine and God is to be praised in His church. If unsaved people come in, they'll see this and know that they're different, and as Paul says, will fall down and glorify God (1 Corinthians 14:24–25).

What were the early disciples doing when they were gathered?

They were . . .

- Continuing daily with one accord.
- Breaking bread from house to house.
- Enjoying fellowship.
- Praising God.
- Having favor with God and man (Acts 2:45–47).

And the result was . . . the Lord added to them such as would be saved (Acts 2:47).
 

Final Thoughts


There must be something different about Christians. People are drawn to the light and will ask about it. We should be using words of grace seasoned with salt (Colossians 4:6)—no need to quote chapter and verse. We can just have speech sprinkled with the word of God.

In the end, there should be a balance between Matthew 28:19–20 (teaching) and Acts 1:8 (witnessing).

To know more about reviving your relationship with Jesus Christ or beginning one, purchase your copy of Where Is the Beauty That We May Desire Him: A Devotional on Isaiah 53 (e-book) on Google Books, Amazon Kindle, or paperback. Your purchases help keep this ministry going.

 
---
Written by Jerry Smith
Image source: www.LumoProject.com on FreeBibleimages.org

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

What Is the Difference Between the KJV and the NIV?


In a discussion of this topic, manuscript evidence only leads to endless debate (cf. 1 Timothy 1:4). But that's a smokescreen to keep believers from looking at the differences in doctrine between the two versions. 

Look at the differences and judge the doctrines for yourself: 

Proverbs 16:6 


(KJV) By mercy and truth iniquity is purged: and by the fear of the LORD men depart from evil. 

(NIV) Through love and faithfulness sin is atoned for; through the fear of the LORD a man avoids evil. 

"Mercy and truth" are external; "love and faithfulness" are things that we have or do. The NIV teaches that forgiveness is attained by working for it. I can use the NIV to cast doubt on salvation by grace. 

The KJV teaches that by something outside of ourselves we can find forgiveness—mercy and truth from the LORD. And that is what we understand to be true regarding salvation. The KJV supports the doctrine of salvation. 

Colossians 1:14 


(KJV) In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins: 

(NIV) ...in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins. 

Redemption means salvation from sin and its penalty. The blood of Christ is missing for redemption in the NIV. The doctrine of Christ's atoning blood is detracted from. 

In the KJV, the blood is an essential element (cf. Ephesians 2:13, 1 Peter 1:2, 1 Peter 1:19, 1 John 1:7). 


Luke 2:33 


(KJV) And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of him. 

(NIV) The child's father and mother marveled at what was said about him. 

Joseph was Mary’s husband in the KJV but not the father of Jesus Christ. The deity of Jesus Christ cannot be attacked. 

The "child’s father" in the NIV supports the idea that Jesus Christ had a human father. The doctrine of the deity and sinless perfection of Christ can now be questioned. 

John 6:69 


(KJV) And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God. 

(NIV) We believe and know that you are the Holy One of God. 

This was Peter's testimony of Jesus Christ the Anointed One, the Messiah. Where is Christ in the NIV? The doctrine of Christ loses efficacy in the NIV. 

Any religious man (such as the Pope) can be called the Holy One of God. I can use the NIV to cast doubt on the need for Christ to be saved. I could argue that the Bible says any holy person is the path to salvation. 

In the KJV, there is no doubt who Peter testified of. The doctrine of Christ is supported. 

Acts 16:31 


(KJV) And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. 

(NIV) They replied, Believe in the LORD Jesus, and you will be saved--you and your household. 

Do we believe on Jesus or Jesus Christ to be saved (2 Corinthians 11:4)? There is a HUGE difference. 

The NIV leaves the door open to salvation by believing in a historical Jesus, a good man, a good teacher. The KJB elevates salvation to believing on Jesus the Christ. 

There is soooo much more… 


In the end, it isn't the endless debates about the genealogies of manuscripts but what these versions teach. Again, the so-called "manuscript evidence" and "original manuscripts" debates are simply distractions. One version teaches the fundamentals of the faith, the other removes them. 

As a Christian, which do you feel more comfortable with? 
Which one is safer? 
Which one makes more sense? 
Which supports basic Christian doctrines?

And keep in mind, there can be only ONE magnified (Psalm 138:2), inspired (2 Timothy 3:16), preserved (Psalm 12:6-7), settled (Psalm 119:89), truth (John 17:17). 

With the differences in wording and (often) meaning, they can't all fulfill these criteria. 

So, which version is it? It’s pretty clear. 

What do you think? You're invited to share your comments.

--- 
Written by Jerry Smith
Feature Image Source: https://www.istockphoto.com/portfolio/skhoward 
Open KJB: https://www.istockphoto.com/photos/crucifixion

Wednesday, August 14, 2019

Beware of Pastors Using Subtle Bible Translations



Some time ago, I attended a service where the pastor made a few comments on Philippians 2:6. The problem was that he was using a passage from a modern Bible version that demoted Christ from being equal with God to being less than equal with God. 

The pastor was using a passage from the ESV:

Who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped (Philippians 2:6, ESV). 

For clarity, the ESV verse above could be paraphrased to read: 

...even though he seemed to be God, he did not consider being equal with God something to be apprehended. 

However, the King James Version reads: 

Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God.

For clarity, a paraphrase of the KJV verse above could be:

...appearing as God in the flesh, did not think it was a crime to be considered equal with God.

The KJV does not tamper with the Deity of Jesus Christ. 

There is no doubt in the King James Bible that God and Jesus Christ are equal (See also: John 1:1-3, 14; John 10:30, John 17:22 1 John 5:7). 

However, the subtle change in the wording used by the English Standard Version (ESV) along with other modern translations such as the BLB, the NASB, HCSB, NET Bible, ASV, ERV, and the WEB, lowers Christ from being equal with God to something less. 

Examine the subtle changes between the ESV and the KJV above for yourself, and remember, subtlety is the key word: 

Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden (Genesis 3:1)? 

The Devil, always seeks to undermine the word of God because it is the believer's foundation. 

You should be alert to these subtle changes that are leading Christians further toward a liberal, hellish, and dangerous theology: 

Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils (1 Timothy 4:1).

Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world (1 John 4:1).

Conclusion

Pastors are supposed to protect the sheep from bad doctrine and false teaching (Acts 20:29-32, Hebrews 13:17). 

Sadly, many pastors themselves are the victims of bad doctrine that modern versions subtly push on them; and they are perhaps inadvertently leading others into the same. 

Nevertheless, you as a believer, are also responsible to study (2 Timothy 2:15), and will be held personally accountable. You cannot blame your pastor if God has told you to study. 

By Jerry Smith


Friday, June 28, 2019

Why Does 'Morning Star' Refer to Lucifer in the NIV but Jesus in the KJV?


If you are using an NIV, the reason you see that is because the NIV translates it that way. If you look at the KJV, this is not an issue:

Revelation 22:16
(KJV) I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.

(NIV) I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.
Clearly, Jesus is the bright and Morning Star here in both versions. 

Isaiah 14:12
(KJV) How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning. how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations.

(NIV) How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn. You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations.
However, here we have a conflict: Lucifer in the KJV is referred to as the son of the morning; whereas, in the NIV, he is referred to as the morning star. 

The KJV uses a different term for Lucifer, but the NIV uses the same terms for both Jesus and Lucifer—creepy, unsettling, and blasphemous. 

2 Peter 1:19

(KJV) We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts.

(NIV) And we have the word of the prophets made more certain, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.

Here, the NIV uses the morning star, but who is it—Jesus or Lucifer—it is unclear because of the previous conflicts. The KJV uses the day star to refer to Jesus and we know who is being referred to. 

There is no excuse for the disparity in the NIV. The NIV translators made the choice to use those words. 

You can check out a similar article here to learn more:



=================

Feature image source: https://www.istockphoto.com/portfolio/skhoward